Profese online 2020, 13(2):46-52 | DOI: 10.5507/pol.2020.016

Validation of the diagnostic elements of the nursing diagnosis interrupted family processes (00060)

Zdeňka Mikšová1, Soňa Loudová2, Jana Konečná3, Šárka Šaňáková1, Vladimír Janout4
1 Ústav ošetřovatelství, Fakulta zdravotnických věd, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Česká republika
2 Stodská nemocnice, Stod, Česká republika
3 Ústav ošetřovatelství, Fakulta zdravotnických věd, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Česká republika
4 Centrum vědy a výzkumu, Fakulta zdravotnických věd, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Olomouc, Česká republika

Purpose: Validation of nursing diagnosis Interrupted family processes (00060) NANDA-I in the socio-cultural context of the Czech Republic.

Methods: Quantitative research using a questionnaire measuring tool and the use of Fehring's model of the validity of diagnostic content - Diagnostic Content Validity model (DCV model).
Findings: Respondents identified three main diagnostic elements of the nursing diagnosis Interrupted family processes, namely: a change in the health status of a family member, changes in family satisfaction, and changes in emotional behavior. The respondents identified the transitional situation in the family as the least comprehensible diagnostic element.
Conclusions: Nursing Diagnosis Interrupted family processes (00060) is to a limited extent comprehensible and applicable to nursing staff and family caregivers in the socio-cultural context of Central Europe.
Implications for nursing practice: Validation of diagnostic elements of nursing diagnosis supports the implementation of standardized nursing terminology in practice.

Keywords: Validation, Diagnostic elements, Nursing diagnosis, Interrupted family processes (00060)

Received: November 2020; Accepted: December 2020; Prepublished online: January 2021; Published: January 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mikšová, Z., Loudová, S., Konečná, J., Šaňáková, Š., & Janout, V. (2020). Validation of the diagnostic elements of the nursing diagnosis interrupted family processes (00060). Profese Online, 13(2), 46-52. doi: 10.5507/pol.2020.016
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Jarošová D. Úvod do komunitního ošetřovatelství. Praha: Grada; 2007.
    2. Stanhope M, Lancaster J. Community & Public Health Nursing (5th edn). St. Louis: Mosby Inc.; 2000.
    3. Colombo F et al. Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-Term Care [Internet]. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2011 [cited 2020 Apr 4]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264097- 759-en Go to original source...
    4. Jeřábek H et al. Rodinná péče o staré lidi [Internet]. Praha: UK FSV; 2005 [cited 2020 Oct 4]. Available from: https://www.ceses.cuni.cz/CESES-20-version1-sesit05_11_jerabek.pdf
    5. COFACE. Who cares? Study on the challenges and needs of family carers in Europe [Internet]. Brussels: COFACE Families Europe; 2017 [cited 2020 Apr 8]. Available from: http://www.coface-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/COFACE-Families-Europe_Study-Family-Carers.pdf
    6. COFACE [Internet]. European Charter for Family carers; 2009 [cited 2017 Oct 4]. Available from: http://www.coface-eu.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2016/12/European-Charter-for-Family-Carers.pdf
    7. Triantafillou J et al. Informal care in the long-term care system. European Overview Paper [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 Apr 4];2010. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a944/3e7bef097d4badf3007fe4305b119f1ce13c.pdf?_ga=2.169138594.2078518884.1543099447-1365738384.1543099447
    8. Herdman RH. Ošetřovatelské diagnózy: definice & klasifikace: 2012-2014 = Nursing diagnoses: definitions and classification: 2012-2014. Praha: Grada; 2013.
    9. Herdman TH et al. 2015. Ošetřovatelské diagnózy: definice & klasifikace 2015-2017 = Nursing diag
    10. noses: definitions and classification: 2015-2017. Praha: Grada; 2015.
    11. Mazalová L, Marečková J. Typy validity ve výzkumu komponent Nanda International. Profese online [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 Apr 4]; 5(2):[11-15 p.]. Go to original source...
    12. Chráska M. Úvod do výzkumu v pedagogice. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého, Pedagogická fakulta; 2006.
    13. Jarošová D et al. Využitelnost ošetřovatelských klasifikací NANDA International a NIC v domácí péči. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita; 2012.
    14. Zeleníková R, Žiaková K. 2012 Validizace ošetřovatelských diagnóz. In: Využitelnost ošetřovatelských klasifikací NANDA International a NIC v domácí péči. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě, Lékařská fakulta; 2012. p. 54.
    15. Amálie De Fátima Lucena, Carla Argenta, Miriam De Abreu Almeida, Sue Moorhead, Elizabeth Swanson. Validation of Nursing Outcomes and Interventions to Older Adults Care with Risk or Frail Elderly Syndrome: Proposal of Linkages Among NOC, NIC, and NANDA-I to clinical practice. Int Journal Nurs Knowl. 2019;30(3):147-153. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12225. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    16. Fehring, Richard J. Validation diagnostic labels: standardized methodology. In: Hurley ME (ed.). Classification of nursing diagnoses: proceedings of the sixth conference. St. Louis: Mosby; 1986.
    17. Fehring, Richard J. Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart and Lung: the journal of critical care. 1987;16(6):625-629.
    18. Zelníková R, Žiaková K, Čáp J, Jarošová D, Vrublová Y. Návrh krtitérií výberu expertov pre validizáciu ošetrovateľských diagnóz v ČR a SR. Kontakt. 2010;12(4):407-413. Go to original source...
    19. Rueda Diaz LJ, De Almeida Lopes Monteiro Da Cruz D, De Cassia Gengo E Silva R. Caregiver role strain: bi-national study of content validation. Invest Educ Enferm [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Jun 6];34(2):[280-287 p.]. Available from: doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v34n2a07 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Kolegarová V, Zeleníková R. Hodnocení definujících charakteristik ošetřovatelské diagnózy přetížení pečovatele. Ošetřovatelství a porodní asistence [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2020 Aug 10];2(4):[282-287 p.]. Available from: http://periodika.osu.cz/osetrovatelstviaporodniasistence/dok/2011-04/1%20_kolegarova_zelenikova.pdf Go to original source...
    21. Tabáková M. Validizácia ošetrovateľskej diagnózy preťaženie opatrovateľa. In: 8. Medzinárodná konferencia: Teória, výskum a vzdelávanie v ošetrovateľstve. Martin: JLF UK; 2011. p. 375-385.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content