Profese online 2013, 6(2):1-4 | DOI: 10.5507/pol.2013.012

VALIDATION OF DIAGNOSTIC ELEMENTS OF THE NURSING DIAGNOSIS ANXIETY 00146 IN MIDWIFERY

Štěpánka Bubeníková, Věra Vránová
Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic

Aim: The aim of the work was to validate diagnostic elements of the nursing diagnosis Anxiety 00146 by a selected sample of experts-midwives in the Czech Republic, and see which diagnostic elements they consider major and minor.

Methods: The study followed Fehring Diagnostic Content Validity Model. A set of experts included 34 midwives from the Czech Republic who received at least 4 points according to the modified Fehring criteria. Experts had bachelor's degree in midwifery or minimal five years of clinical practice. For accessing the significance of diagnostic elements we built a measurement instrument containing 79 items - the diagnostic elements listed in the classification system of NANDA-International.

Results: Out of the 79 defining characteristics considered by experts-midwives five characteristics were described as major (score ≥ 0,75): internal restlessness (0,76), increased blood pressure (0,75), tachycardia (0,75), tachypnea (0,75), threats to the status of role in health (0,76).

Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that midwives consider only five defining characteristics as major for assesing anxiety of mothers coming to the delivery room for delivery.

Keywords: nursing diagnosis, anxiety, validation, DCV model, expert, midwifery

Published: October 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bubeníková, Š., & Vránová, V. (2013). VALIDATION OF DIAGNOSTIC ELEMENTS OF THE NURSING DIAGNOSIS ANXIETY 00146 IN MIDWIFERY. Profese Online, 6(2), 1-5. doi: 10.5507/pol.2013.012
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article
    Czech version

    References

    1. CREASON, N. S. 2004. Clinical Validation of Nursing Diagnoses. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 2004, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 123-132. ISSN 2047-3095. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. FEHRING, R. J. 1986. Validating diagnostic labels: Standardized methodology. Classification of nursing diagnoses: In Proceedings of the sixth conference. 1st ed. St. Louis: Mosby Inc., 1986. p. 183-190. ISBN 0-801637-66-X.
    3. HOLMANOVÁ, E., ŽIAKOVÁ, K., ČÁP, J. 2006. Metodologické poznámky k problematike validizácie ošetřovatelských diagnóz. Kontakt. 2006, roč. 8, č. 1, s. 25-30. ISSN 1212-4117. Go to original source...
    4. MAREČKOVÁ, J. 2006. Ošetřovatelské diagnózy v NANDA doménách. 1. vyd. Praha: Grada, 2006. 264 s. ISBN 80-247-1399-3.
    5. NANDA International NURSING DIAGNOSES: Definitions and Classification 2012-2014. 9th ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. 568 pp. ISBN 978-0-470-65482-8.
    6. OLIVEIRA, N., CHIANCA, T., RASSOOL, G. 2008. A Validation Study of the Nursing Diagnosis Anxiety in Brazil. International Journal Of Nursing Terminologies & Classifications. 2008, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 102-110. ISSN 2047-3095. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. TABAKOVÁ, M., ZELENÍKOVÁ, R., KOLEGAROVÁ, V. 2011. Preťaženie opatrovateľa - obsahová validizáci a ošetrovateľskej diagnózy v Slovenskej a Českej republike. PROFESE on-line. 2011, roč. 4, č. 2, s. 27-31. ISSN 1803-4330. Go to original source...
    8. WHITLEY, G. G. 1994. Expert validation and differentiation of the nursing diagnoses anxiety and fear. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 1994, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 143-150. ISSN 1744-618X. Go to original source...
    9. WHITLEY, G., G. 1999. Processes and methodologies for research validation of nursing diagnoses. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications. 1999, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 5-14. Go to original source...
    10. ISSN 2047-3095.
    11. ZACHAROVÁ, E., ŠIMÍČKOVÁ-ČÍŽKOVÁ, J. 2007. Psychologie pro zdravotnické obory: vybrané kapitoly. 1. vyd. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě, Zdravotně sociální fakulta, 2007. 191 s. ISBN 978-80-7368-334-4.
    12. ZELENÍKOVÁ, R., ŽIAKOVÁ, K. 2012. Hodnotenie definujúcich charakteristik ošetrovateľskej diagnózy Deficit vedomostí. PROFESE on-line. 2012, roč. 5, č. 1, s. 35-38. ISSN 1803-4330. Go to original source...
    13. ZELENÍKOVÁ, R., ŽIAKOVÁ, K. 2009. Prehľad modelov validizácie ošetrovateľských diagnóz. In ČÁP, J., ŽIAKOVÁ, K. (eds.). Teória, výskum a vzdelávanie v ošetrovateľstve a v pôrodnej asistencii. Martin: JLF UK, 2009, s. 411-422. ISBN 978-80-88866-61-9.
    14. ZELENÍKOVÁ, R., ŽIAKOVÁ, K., ČÁP, J., JAROŠOVÁ, D., VRUBLOVÁ, Y. 2010. Návrh kritérií výberu expertov pre validizáciu šetrovateľských diagnóz v ČR a SR.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content