Profese online 2015, 8(1):24-29 | DOI: 10.5507/pol.2015.004

PERIOPERATIVE SAFETY PROCESS IN PRACTICE

Tereza Langerová, Magda Taliánová, Petra Pavlová
Department of Midwifery and Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic

Background: The paper describes the problems of perioperative safety process (PBP) in practice in relation to the region in which perioperative care nurses work. Realization of research was performed in 4 health facilities in the territory of the East and the West Bohemian region.

Aim: We established four goals in our research: to determine the level of awareness of respondents about PBP, whether and how long the responders used PBP in their workplaces, how perioperative care nurses perceive the utility of PBP for the patient and how responders are satisfied with setting of PBP in their workplace.

Methods: We compiled 27-items questionnaire for our research. The resulting data were evaluated by descriptive statistics and neparametrical Mann - Whitney test. 61 responders participated in this research. The research sample consisted of 45 perioperative care nurses and 16 anestethic nurses from gynaecological and central operating rooms of four health facilities in the territory of the East and the West Bohemian region. The respondents agreed with the research.

Results: We found that on workplace of all respondents is used the perioperative safety process for ± 3 years (average 3.29, standard deviation 0.85). The awareness of respondents about perioperative safety process was evaluated as excellent. Most of respondents are satisfied with the setting of perioperative safety process on their workplace and their perceive the utility of perioperative safety process as very high.

Conclusion: Perioperative safety process is the integral part of every operation and it´s required to be carried at all workplaces in accordance with departmental safety objective.

Keywords: perioperative safety process, perioperative nurse, quality of healthcare, operative theatre, health

Published: April 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Langerová, T., Taliánová, M., & Pavlová, P. (2015). PERIOPERATIVE SAFETY PROCESS IN PRACTICE. Profese Online, 8(1), 24-29. doi: 10.5507/pol.2015.004
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article
    Czech version

    References

    1. Wichsová J, et al. Sestra a perioperační péče. Praha: Grada; 2013.
    2. Jedličková J, et al. Ošetřovatelská perioperační péče.Brno:Národnícentrumošetřovatelstvíanelékařských zdravotnických oborů; 2012.
    3. Mantz J, Dahmani S, Paugam-Burtz C. Výsledky perioperační péče. In: Cvachovec J, editor. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology - české vydání. 2010; 1(2):36-43.
    4. Ministerstvo zdravotnictví České republiky. Prevence záměny orgánu, strany výkonu či pacienta - Řešení otázek bezpečnosti pacientů. Svazek 1, Řešení 4 [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2014 Oct 26].Available from: http://www.mzcr.cz/kvalitaabezpeci/dokumenty/prevence-zameny-organu-strany-vykonu-ci-pacienta_4978_2378_20.html
    5. Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové. Program kvality. Bezpečí pacientů [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2014 Oct 27].Available from: http://www.fnhk.cz/pacient-a-jeho-blizci/program-kvality/bezpeci-pacientu
    6. WHO: World Alliance for Patient Safety. Implementation manual surgical checklist (First edition). [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2014 Oct 30]. Availbale from: www.who.int/entity/patientsafety/ safesurgery/tools_resources/SSSL_Manual_finalJun08.pdf?ua?=1
    7. FilipováM,PokojováR.Předoperačníbezpečnostní proces - úskalí implementace. Sestra. 2011; 21(2):34-6.
    8. Ministerstvo zdravotnictví České republiky. Resortní bezpečnostní cíle [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2014 Oct 14]. Available from: http://www.mzcr.cz/kvalitaabezpeci/obsah/resortni-bezpecnostni-cile_1837_15.html
    9. STAT SOFT. STATISTICA© [Internet]. Praha: 1984 [cited 2014 Oct 25]. Available from: http://www.statsoft.cz/o-firme/profil-spolecnosti
    10. Haynes A, Weser T, Berry W. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global [Internet]. Pub Med - Medline Database. 2009 [cited 2014 Nov 4]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19144931 Go to original source...
    11. Weightlein, G. The Surgical Safety Checklist. Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Student Medical Journal. 2011;1(4) [Internet]. [cited 2015 Jan 7]. Available from: http://www.rcsismj.com/4th-edition/surg-checklist CONTACT DETAILS OF CORRESPONDING AUTHOR PhDr. Magda Taliánová, Ph.D.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content