Profese online 2013, 6(1):11-15 | DOI: 10.5507/pol.2013.003

THE USE OF THE NOC CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM IN CONDITIONS OF INTENSIVE CARE

Jitka Hůsková1,2, Petra Juřeníková1,2
1 Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
2 Technical Secondary School of Hotel Management and Health Care, Uherské Hradiště, Czech Republic

Aim: The evaluation using of cardiopulmonary class NOC outcomes of classificatory system in the relation to 00031 NANDA-I. Ineffective Airways Clearence diagnosis. With a view to testing use classificatory systems NNN by nurses in the real clinical workplaces of intensive care.

Methods: Nurses evaluated using the outcomes array of NOC cardiopulmonary class of the classificatory system (4th edition, 2008) which they would really use in their clinical workplaces in the relation to fixed nursing diagnosis 00031 NANDA Int.-Ineffective Airways Clearence (NANDA-I, 2009-2011, translation Kudlová, p. 360). They evaluted with help of Likert type scale into recording list. For NOC outcome evalution comparison by nurses from individual clinical workplaces Pearsen chi-square test for independency was used after the basic statistical processing (arithmetic mean, median, standard tolerance.

Results: Research did not prove statistically significant differences of nurses (n65)evalution at outcomes 0412; 0415; 0416; of NOC cardiopulmonary class of the classificatory system.

Conclusion: The research enquiry brought partial results to IGA MZČR NF 12078-4/2011 project which supports implementation of NIC classificatory system in surgical and anaesthetic nursing care into the conditions of clinical practice of the Czech Republic.

Keywords: NNN Classification, Ineffective Airway Clearence, Intensive Care, Airways

Published: April 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hůsková, J., & Juřeníková, P. (2013). THE USE OF THE NOC CLASSIFICATORY SYSTEM IN CONDITIONS OF INTENSIVE CARE. Profese Online, 6(1), 12-16. doi: 10.5507/pol.2013.003
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article
    Czech version

    References

    1. AHERN, C. K. 2003. Applying Standardized Nursing Language to Three Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programs in Rural Setting. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classification. 2003, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 32. ISSN 1541-5147. Go to original source...
    2. BOLEDOVIČOVÁ, M. et al. Použitie Aliance NNN v neonatologickom ošetrovateľstve. In BUŽGOVÁ, R. a SIKOROVÁ, L. (eds.) Ošetřovatelská diagnostika a praxe založená na důkazech II. Nursing diagnostics and evidence based practice II. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě, 2008. s. 5-9. ISBN 978-80-7368-499-0.
    3. BUTCHER, H., JOHNSON, M. 2012. Use of linkages for clinical reasoning and quality improvement. In Johnson, M. et al.NOC and NIC Linkages to NANDA-I and Clinical Conditions, Support Critical Reasoning and Quality Care. 3th ed. Iowa: Mosby Elsevier, 2012. s. 11-23. ISBN 978-0-323-07703-3.
    4. KAUTZ, D. et al. 2006. Using NANDA, NIC, and NOC (NNN) Language for Clinical Reasoning with the Outcome-Present-State-Test (OPT) Model. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classification. 2006, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 129-138. ISSN 1541-5147. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. LAVIN, M. A., et al. 2007. A Dialogue on the Future of Nursing Practice. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classification. 2007, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 74-83. ISSN 1541-5147. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. LOPES, J., et al. 2009. A pilot Study to Validate the Priority Nursing Interevntions Classification Interventions and Nursing Outcomes Classification Outcomes for the Nursing Diagnosis Excess Fluid Volume in Cardiac Patients. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classification. 2009, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 76-88. ISSN 1541-5147. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. LUNNEY, M., et al. 2010. Consensus-validation study identifies relevant nursing diagnoses, nursing interventions, and health outcomes for people with traumatic brain injuries. Rehabilitation Nursing: The Oficcial Journal of the Association of Rehabilitant Nurses. 2010, vol. 35, no. 4, p. 161-166. ISSN 0278-4807. Go to original source...
    8. MAREČKOVÁ, J. 2007. Klasifikace ošetřovatelských diagnóz NANDA. In HANZLÍKOVÁ, A. (eds.). Klasifikačné systémy a štandardizácia terminologie v ošetřovateľstve. Martin: Osveta, 2007. s. 13-28. ISBN 978-80-8063-242-7.
    9. MARINI, M. et al. 2011. Evaluation of the Accurary of Nursing Diagnoses in a Brazilian Emergency Service. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classification. 2011, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 56-67. ISSN 1541-5147. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    10. MÜLLER-STAUB, M. et al. 2009. Evalution of the implementation of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classification. 2009, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 9-15. ISSN 1541-5147. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. MÜLLER-STAUB, M. et al. 2007. Meeting the criteria of a nursing diagnosis classification: Evalution of ICNPs, ICF, NANDA and ZEFP. International Journal of Nursing Studies [online]. 2007, roč. 44, č. 5 [cit. 12. 12. 2011]. Dostupný z WWW: http://journalofnursingstudies.com.
    12. NANDA International NURSING DIAGNOSES: Definitions & Classfication 2009-2011.(ed). HERDMAN, H. Oxford: Willey-Blackvell, s. 308, 419. ISBN 978-1-4051-8718-3.
    13. NANDA ošetřovatelské diagnózy definice & klasifikace 2009-2011.(ed). HERDMAN, H. Translation KUDLOVÁ, P. 2010. 1. české vyd. Praha: Grada Publishing, 2010. 456 s. ISBN 978-80-247-3423-1.
    14. Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). 2008.
    15. MOORHEAD, S., JOHNSON, M. et al. (eds). Iowa: Mosby, Elsevier, s. 130. ISBN 978-0-323-05408-9.
    16. SEGANFREDO, H. D., ALMEIDA, M. A. Nursing Outcomes Content Validation According to Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) for Clinical, Surgical and Critical Patients. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. [online]. 2011, roč. 19, č. 1 [cit. 2011-12-12]. ISSN 0104-1169. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Dostupný z WWW: http://scielo.br. SCHERB, C. A. 2011. Most Frequent Nursing Diagnoses, Nursing Interventions, and Nursing-Sensitive Patient Outcomes of Hospitalized Older Adults with Heart Failure. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classification. 2011, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 13-21. ISSN 1541-5147. Go to original source...
    18. STEFANOVÁ, P., MAREČKOVÁ, J. 2010. NOC a NIC klasifikace u pacientů s ošetřovatelskou diagnózou riziko porušení kožní integrity - 00047. In BUŽGOVÁ, R., JAROŠOVÁ, D. (eds.). Ošetřovatelský výzkum a praxe založená na důkazech. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě, 2010. s. 143. ISBN 978-80-7368-694-9.
    19. VÖRÖSOVÁ, G. 2007. Vybrané súbory NNN v geriatrickom ošetrovateľstve. In ARCHALOUSOVÁ, A. (eds.). Cesta k profesnímu ošetřovatelství. Opava: Slezská univerzita, 2007. s. 66-70. ISBN 978-80-7248-413-3.
    20. ZEITOUN, S. et al. 2007. Clinical validation of the signs and symptoms and the nature of the respiratory nursing diagnoses in patients under invasive mechanical ventilation. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2007, vol. 16, no. 8. Dostupný z WWW: http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01632.x Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content