Profese online 2011, 4(1):33-37 | DOI: 10.5507/pol.2011.008

The CAM method for assessment of acute confusion

Gabriela Vörösová
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Sciences and Health Care, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovak Republic

Aim: To identify acute confusion by nurses in the conditions of the Slovak Republic and the Czech Republic. To find the differences between the chosen groups of patients by gender, age, medical diagnoses and days of duration of acute confusion.

Methods: We used the Slovak version of the CAM (Confusion Assessment Method) scale. The Student's t-test and the Pearson correlation were used to evaluate the data.

Results: The significant differences were found in the age groups, medical diagnoses and duration of acute confusion. No differences were found between the genders.

Conclusion: We recommend the CAM scale to be used in the clinical conditions to identify acute confusion, and to be tested for its further use in nursing.

Keywords: CAM, acute confusion, delirium, nurse

Published: April 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vörösová, G. (2011). The CAM method for assessment of acute confusion. Profese Online4(1), 33-37. doi: 10.5507/pol.2011.008
Download citation

References

  1. BEDNAŘÍK, J. 2006. Delirium: nová výzva pro neurologii? Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie. 2006, roč. 69/102, č. 1, s. 18-26. ISSN 1210-7859.
  2. Diagnostic and Statistical Manua lof Mental Disorders, (DSM-IV). 4th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Press, 1995. 886 pp. ISBN 0-89042-062-9.
  3. ELY, E. W. et al. 2001. The impal of delirium in the intensit care unit on hospitál length of stay. Intensive Care Medicine. 2001, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1892-1900. ISSN 1525-1489. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. GLEASON, O. C. 2003. Delirium. American Family Physician. 2003, vol. 67, no. 5, p. 1027-1034. ISSN 0002-838X. Go to PubMed...
  5. HEGYI, L., KRAJČÍK, ©. 2004. Geriatria pre praktického lekára. 1. vyd. Bratislava: HERBA, 2004. s. 274-275. ISBN 80-89171-06-0.
  6. HERDMAN, H. T. et al. 2009. NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses Definitions and Classification. 2009-2011. USA: Sheridan Books, 2009. 435 pp. ISBN 978-1-4051-8718-3.
  7. HESTERMANN, U. et al. 2009. Validation of a German version of the confusion assessment metod for delirium detection in a sample of acute geriatric patiens with a high prevalence of dementia. Psychopatology. 2009, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 270-276. ISSN 0254-4962. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. INOUYE, S. K. et al. 1990. Clarifing Confusion: The Confusion Assessment Metod A New Metod for Detection of Delirium. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1990, vol. 113, no. 12, pp. 941-948. ISSN 1539-3704. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. INOUYE, S. K. et al. 2007. Risk factors for delirium at Discharge. Development and validation of a Predictive Model. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007, vol. 167, no. 13, pp. 1406-1413. ISSN 1539-3704. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. LAURILA, J. V. et al. 2002. Confusion assessment method in the diagnostics of delirium among aged hopital pacients: would it serve better in screening than as a diagnostic instrument? J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1112-1119. ISSN 1064-7481. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. LEENTJENS, A. F. G, VAN der MAST, R. C., 2005. Delirium in elderly people: an update. Curr Opin Psychiatry, 2005, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 325-330. ISBN 1473-6578. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. LEMIENGRE, J. et al. 2006. Detection of delirium by bedside nurses using the confusion assessment method. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006. vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 685-689. ISSN 1064-7481. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. LESLIE, A. et al. 2008. The Confusion Assessment Metod (CAM): A Systematic Review of Current Usage. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008. vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 823-830. ISSN 1064-7481. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. MARCANTONIO et al. 2005. Outcomes of Older People Admitted to Postacute Facilities with Delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005. vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 963-969. ISSN 1064-7481. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. MEDZINÁRODNÁ KLASIFIKÁCIA CHORÔB - 10. REVÍZIA. 1992. BRATISLAVA: OBZOR, 1992. 171 s. ISBN 80-215-0249-5.
  16. MILISEN, K. et al. 2005. Psychometric properties of the Flemish translation of the NEECHAM Confusion Scale. Psychiatry. 2005, vol. 5, no. 16, pp. 1-11. ISSN 1471-244X. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. ROLFSON, D. B. et al. 1999. Validity of the confusion assessment method in detecting postoperative delirium in the elderly. Int Psychogeriatr. 1999, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 431-438. ISSN 1741-203X. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. SCHOR, J. D. et al. 1992. Risk Factors for Delirium in Hospitalized Elderly. JAMA. 1992, vol. 267, no. 6, pp. 827-831. ISSN 0098-7484. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. TOPINKOVÁ, E. 2004. Delirantní stavy u starých osob a jejich zvládání. Postgraduální medicína. 2004, roč. 6, č. 3, s. 279-282. ISSN 1212-4184.
  20. VÖRÖSOVÁ, G. et al. 2005. Interné oąetrovateµstvo. Učebnica pre fakulty oąetrovateµstva. 1. vyd. Martin: Osveta, 2005. 198 s. ISBN 80-8063-192-1.
  21. WAKEFIELD, B. et al. 2001. Acute confusion. In MAAS et al. Nursing Care of Older Adults: Diagnosis, Outcomes & Interventions. 1st ed. Missouri USA: Mosby, 2001, pp. 442-454. ISBN 0-323-01259-0.
  22. ZOU, Y. et al. 1998. Detection and diagnosis of delirium in the elderly: psychiatrist diagnosis, confusion assessment method, or consensus diagnosis? Int. Psychogeriatr. 1998, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 303-308. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. ISSN 1741-203X.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.